Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika
Articles
DOI: 10.20414/betajtm.v18i1.696
Submitted: 2025-04-17
Published: 2025-05-30

The relationship between mathematical literacy and the realistic mathematic education approach: A systematic literature review

Universitas Syiah Kuala
Universitas Syiah Kuala
Mathematics Education Department, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Mathematical literacy Realistic mathematics education Systematic literature review Context-based learning

Galleys

Abstract

[English]: This systematic literature review (SLR) explores the relationship between mathematical literacy and the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach, which emphasizes the use of real-world contexts in mathematics instruction. This review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to ensure transparency and rigor in the selection, analysis, and synthesis of relevant studies. The review examines studies published between 2019 and 2024, focusing on trends, research methodologies, and the effectiveness of RME in enhancing students' mathematical literacy. The evidence suggests a potential relationship between the implementation of RME and students tendencies to demonstrate a better grasp of mathematical concepts, as well as a stronger inclination toward solving problems in context-based settings. These findings, while drawn from limited and non-randomized studies, suggest that RME may be associated with more meaningful student engagement in mathematics.The review also identifies the research instruments frequently used in RME-related studies and highlights the importance of contextualized learning in promoting mathematical literacy. Despite challenges, such as the need for more innovative, contextually relevant learning designs and the adaptation of RME across various educational settings, the approach has proven to be an effective strategy for advancing students' mathematical literacy, critical thinking, and problem-solving abilities. These findings contribute to the growing body of research that advocates for context-driven approaches in mathematics education. 

[Bahasa]: Tinjauan literatur sistematis (SLR) ini mengeksplorasi hubungan antara literasi matematika dan pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik (RME), yang menekankan penggunaan konteks dunia nyata dalam pengajaran matematika. Kajian ini mengkaji studi yang diterbitkan antara tahun 2019 dan 2024, dengan fokus pada tren, metodologi penelitian, dan efektivitas RME dalam meningkatkan literasi matematika siswa. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa RME secara signifikan meningkatkan pemahaman siswa tentang konsep matematika dan memperkuat keterampilan pemecahan masalah mereka dengan menggabungkan pengalaman belajar berbasis konteks yang praktis. Tinjauan ini juga mengidentifikasi instrumen penelitian yang sering digunakan dalam penelitian terkait RME dan menyoroti pentingnya pembelajaran kontekstual dalam mempromosikan literasi matematika. Terlepas dari tantangan yang ada, seperti kebutuhan akan desain pembelajaran yang lebih inovatif dan relevan secara kontekstual serta adaptasi RME di berbagai lingkungan pendidikan, pendekatan ini telah terbukti menjadi strategi yang efektif untuk memajukan literasi matematika siswa, berpikir kritis, dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah. Temuan-temuan ini berkontribusi pada penelitian yang terus berkembang yang mendukung pendekatan berbasis konteks dalam pendidikan matematika.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Ahdhianto, E., Marsigit, M., Haryanto, H., & Santi, N. N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive-based contextual learning model on fifth-grade students’ problem-solving and mathematical communication skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 753–764. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.753
  2. Ali, R. A., & Wardat, Y. (2024). Exploring students’ mathematical literacy: The role of self-efficacy and learning environment. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i8.2838
  3. Astuti, N. R., Gunarhadi, & Mintasih. (2020). The effect of RME on mathematics learning outcomes viewed from mathematical communication skills. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 5(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.650864
  4. Budiarto, M. T., & Wijayanti, P. (2021). Development of realistic mathematics learning tools to improve students’ mathematical literacy ability. Mathematics Education Journal, 5(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v5i2.16571
  5. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Routledge.
  6. Deda, Y. N., Laja, Y. P. W., & Talan, N. (2024). Effectiveness of using Koin Muatan teaching aids to improve numeracy skills. International Journal of Research in Education, 4(1), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.26877/ijre.v4i1.16876
  7. Fauzan, A., Harisman, Y., Yerizon, Suherman, S., Tasman, F., Nisa, S., ... Syaputra, H. (2024). Realistic mathematics education (RME) to improve literacy and numeracy skills of elementary school students based on teachers’ experience. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p301-316
  8. Freudenthal, H. (1999). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
  9. Galvis, Á. H. (2018). Supporting decision-making processes on blended learning in higher education: Literature and good practices review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0106-1
  10. Goos, M., & O’Sullivan, K. (2023). The evolution and uptake of numeracy and mathematical literacy as drivers for curriculum reform. In Y. Shimizu & R. Vithal (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum reforms around the world (pp. 345–357). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13548-4_21
  11. Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Technipress.
  12. Gravemeijer, K., & Stephan, M. (2002). Emergent models as an instructional design heuristic. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. Van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 145–169). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3194-2_10
  13. Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2024). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches(7th ed.). Sage Publications.
  14. Kolar, V. M., & Hodnik, T. (2021). Mathematical literacy from the perspective of solving contextual problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.467
  15. Kusmaryono, I., & Kusumaningsih, W. (2023). Evaluating the results of PISA assessment: Are there gaps between the teaching of mathematical literacy at schools and in PISA assessment? European Journal of Educational Research, 12(3), 1479–1493. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.3.1479
  16. Lady, A., Utomo, B. T., & Chikita, L. (2018). Improving mathematical ability and student learning outcomes through realistic mathematics education (RME) approach. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.10), 55. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.10.10954
  17. Lee, J., & Paul, N. (2023). A review of pedagogical approaches for improved engagement and learning outcomes in mathematics. Journal of Student Research, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i3.5021
  18. Lubis, E. R., Fauzi, K. M. A., & Mulyono, M. (2024). Development of a learning model based on RME for improving mathematical literacy skills and students’ mathematical disposition. Jurnal Paedagogy, 11(3), 612. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v11i3.11544
  19. Maslihah, S., Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, Kartono, Karomah, N., & Iqbal, K. (2021). Increasing mathematical literacy ability and learning independence through problem-based learning model with realistic mathematics education approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4), 042123. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042123
  20. Nugroho, M. N. A. P., Wijaya, M. B. R., & Suminar, T. (2023). Numeratic literacy in mathematics learning assisted of RME-based booklet teaching materials in class V elementary school students. International Journal of Research and Review, 10(1), 468–474. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230153
  21. Nurmasari, L., Budiyono, Nurkamto, J., & Ramli, M. (2023). Realistic mathematics engineering for improving elementary school students’ mathematical literacy. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp1-26
  22. OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 results (Volume III): Creative minds, creative schools. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/765ee8c2-en
  23. Palinussa, A. L. (2020). Comparison of algebra learning outcomes using realistic mathematics education (RME), team assisted individualization (TAI) and conventional learning models in junior high school 1 Masohi. Infinity Journal, 9(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i2.p173-182
  24. Panhuizen, M. van den, & Drijvers, P. (2020). Realistic mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 713–717). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_170
  25. Pashkova, I. P., Palahniuk, H. O., & Matokhniuk, M. O. (2021). English version: Experience of implementing information technologies in the process of studying clinical disciplines at a higher medical educational institution. The Medical and Ecological Problems, 25(1–2), 47–49. https://doi.org/10.31718/mep.2021.25.1-2.12
  26. Pisani, N., Kourula, A., Kolk, A., & Meijer, R. (2017). How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.05.003
  27. Post, A. L. (2019). Developing numeracy and problem-solving skills by overcoming learning bottlenecks. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(3), 398–414. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2018-0049
  28. Purwanti, K. L., Sukestiyarno, Waluya, B., & Rochmat. (2019). Mathematical literacy ability with RME (realistic mathematics education) approach in fifth grade students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(2), 022118. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/2/022118
  29. Rahayu, S., Kurniasih, E., Hudori, A., Yahya, A., Sari, R. K., & Nurbaeti, U. (2023). Model pembelajaran kontekstual dan pemahaman konsep matematika: Studi eksperimen semu. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(5), 1807–1814. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v5i5.5357
  30. Rusdi, Fauzan, A., Arnawa, I. M., & Lufri. (2020). Designing mathematics learning models based on realistic mathematics education and literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1471(1), 012055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1471/1/012055
  31. Sari, N., Prasetyawati, Y., Sukmaningthias, N., & Simarmata, R. H. (2023). Development of e-worksheet based on realistic mathematics education to support mathematical literacy skills of junior high school students. E3S Web of Conferences, 400, 03006. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340003006
  32. Susanta, A., Sumardi, H., Susanto, E., & Retnawati, H. (2023). Mathematics literacy task on number pattern using Bengkulu context for junior high school students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i1.pp85-102
  33. Umbara, U., & Nuraeni, Z. (2019). Implementation of realistic mathematics education based on Adobe Flash Professional CS6 to improve mathematical literacy. Infinity Journal, 8(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v8i2.p167-178
  34. Wijaya, A. (2015). Context-based mathematics tasks in Indonesia: Toward better practice and achievement (Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University). https://www.fisme.science.uu.nl/publicaties/literatuur/Thesis_Ariyadi_Wijaya_LR.pdf
  35. Wijaya, R. P., Budiarto, M. T., & Wijayanti, P. (2021). Development of realistic mathematics learning tools to improve students’ mathematical literacy ability. Mathematics Education Journal, 5(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v5i2.16571
  36. Yusmar, F., & Fadilah, R. E. (2023). Analisis rendahnya literasi sains peserta didik Indonesia: Hasil PISA dan faktor penyebab. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 13(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v13i1.283

How to Cite

A’la, N., Cut Morina, Z., & Elizar, E. (2025). The relationship between mathematical literacy and the realistic mathematic education approach: A systematic literature review . Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 18(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v18i1.696

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Nurul A'la, Zubainur Cut Morina, Elizar Elizar

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.